Pilot and student pilot community. Share your pilot lessons or aviation stories.



Charts and Projections (Part Three)

in Maps and Charts

Conic Projections


There are two classes of conic projections. The first is a simple conic projection constructed by placing the apex of the cone over some part of the earth (usually the pole) with the cone tangent to a parallel called the standard parallel and projecting the graticule of the reduced earth onto the cone. [Figure 1-26] The chart is obtained by cutting the cone along some meridian and unrolling it to form a flat surface. Notice, in Figure 1-27, the characteristic gap appears when the cone is unrolled. The second is a secant cone, cutting through the earth and actually contacting the surface at two standard parallels as shown in Figure 1-28.

Figure 1-26. Simple conic projection.

Figure 1-26. Simple conic projection.

Figure 1-27. Simple conic projection of northern hemisphere.

Figure 1-27. Simple conic projection of northern hemisphere.

Figure 1-28. Conic projection using secant cone.

Figure 1-28. Conic projection using secant cone.

Lambert Conformal (Secant Cone)

The Lambert conformal conic projection is of the conical type in which the meridians are straight lines that meet at a common point beyond the limits of the chart and parallels are concentric circles, the center of each being the point of intersection of the meridians. Meridians and parallels intersect at right angles. Angles formed by any two lines or curves on the earth’s surface are correctly represented. The projection may be developed by either the graphic or mathematical method. It employs a secant cone intersecting the spheroid at two parallels of latitude, called the standard parallels, of the area to be represented. The standard parallels are represented at exact scale. Between these parallels, the scale factor is less than unity and, beyond them, greater than unity. For equal distribution of scale error (within and beyond the standard parallels), the standard parallels are selected at one-sixth and five-sixths of the total length of the segment of the central meridian represented. The development of the Lambert conformal conic projection is shown by Figure 1-29.

Figure 1-29. Lambert conformal conic projection.

Figure 1-29. Lambert conformal conic projection.

The chief use of the Lambert conformal conic projection is in mapping areas of small latitudinal width but great longitudinal extent. No projection can be both conformal and equal area but, by limiting latitudinal width, scale error is decreased to the extent the projection gives very nearly an equal area representation in addition to the inherent quality of conformality. This makes the projection very useful for aeronautical charts. Some of the advantages of the Lambert conformal conic projection are:

  1. Conformality.
  2. Great circles are approximated by straight lines (actually concave toward the midparallel).
  3. For areas of small latitudinal width, scale is nearly constant. For example, the United States may be mapped with standard parallels at 33° N and 45° N with a scale error of only 2 percent for southern Florida. The maximum scale error between 30°30′ N and 47°30′ N is only one-half of 1 percent.
  4. Positions are easily plotted and read in terms of latitude and longitude. Construction is relatively simple.
  5. Its two standard parallels give it two lines of strength (lines along which elements are represented true to shape and scale).
  6. Distance may be measured quite accurately. For example, the distance from Pittsburgh to Istanbul is 5,277 NM; distance as measured by the graphic scale on a Lambert projection (standard parallels 36° N and 54° N) without application of the scale factor is 5,258 NM; an error of less than 0.4 percent.

Some of the chief limitations of the Lambert Conformal conic projection are:

  1. Rhumb lines are curved lines that cannot be plotted accurately.
  2. Maximum scale increases as latitudinal width increases.
  3. Parallels are curved lines (arcs of concentric circles).
  4. Continuity of conformality ceases at the junction of two bands, even though each is conformal. If both have the same scale along their standard parallels, the common parallel (junction) has a different radius for each band and does not join perfectly.

Constant of the Cone

Most conic charts have the constant of the cone (convergence factor) computed and listed on the chart somewhere in the chart margin.

Convergence Angle (CA)

The convergence angle (CA) is the actual angle on a chart formed by the intersection of the Greenwich meridian and another meridian; the pole serves as the vertex of the angle. CAs, like longitudes, are measured east and west from the Greenwich meridian.

Convergence Factor (CF)

A chart’s convergence factor (CF) is a decimal number that expresses the ratio between meridional convergence as it actually exists on the earth and as it is portrayed on the chart. When the CA equals the number of the selected meridian, the chart CF is 1.0. When the CA is less than the number of the selected meridian, the chart CF is proportionately less than 1.0. The subpolar projection illustrated in Figure 1-30 portrays the standard parallels, 37° N and 65° N. It presents 360° of the earth’s surface on 282.726° of paper. Therefore, the chart has a CF of 0.78535 (282.726° divided by 360° equals 0.78535). Meridian 90° W forms a west CA of 71° with the Greenwich meridian.

Express as a formula:
CF × longitude = CA
0.78535 × 90° W = 71° west CA

Approximate a chart’s CF on subpolar charts by drawing a straight line covering 10 lines of longitude and measuring the true course at each end of the line, noting the difference between them, and dividing the difference by 10. NOTE: The quotient represents the chart’s CF.

Figure 1-30. A Lambert Conformal, convergence factor 0.78535.

Figure 1-30. A Lambert Conformal, convergence factor 0.78535.

 

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: