Pilot and student pilot community. Share your pilot lessons or aviation stories.

Instrument Approach Systems – ILS Errors

in Navigation Systems

The ILS and its components are subject to certain errors, which are listed below. Localizer and GS signals are subject to the same type of bounce from hard objects as space waves.

  1. Reflection. Surface vehicles and even other aircraft flying below 5,000 feet above ground level (AGL) may disturb the signal for aircraft on the approach.
  2. False courses. In addition to the desired course, GS facilities inherently produce additional courses at higher vertical angles. The angle of the lowest of these false courses will occur at approximately 9°–12°. An aircraft flying the LOC/GS course at a constant altitude would observe gyrations of both the GS needle and GS warning flag as the aircraft passed through the various false courses. Getting established on one of these false courses will result in either confusion (reversed GS needle indications) or in the need for a very high descent rate. However, if the approach is conducted at the altitudes specified on the appropriate approach chart, these false courses will not be encountered.

Marker Beacons

The very low power and directional antenna of the marker beacon transmitter ensures that the signal will not be received any distance from the transmitter site. Problems with signal reception are usually caused by the airborne receiver not being turned on, or by incorrect receiver sensitivity.

Some marker beacon receivers, to decrease weight and cost, are designed without their own power supply. These units utilize a power source from another radio in the avionics stack, often the ADF. In some aircraft, this requires the ADF to be turned on in order for the marker beacon receiver to function, yet no warning placard is required. Another

source of trouble may be the “High/Low/Off” three-position switch, which both activates the receiver and selects receiver sensitivity. Usually, the “test” feature only tests to see if the light bulbs in the marker beacon lights are working. Therefore, in some installations, there is no functional way for the pilot to ascertain the marker beacon receiver is actually on except to fly over a marker beacon transmitter, and see if a signal is received and indicated (e.g., audibly, and visually via marker beacon lights).

Operational Errors

  1. Failure to understand the fundamentals of ILS ground equipment, particularly the differences in course dimensions. Since the VOR receiver is used on the localizer course, the assumption is sometimes made that interception and tracking techniques are identical when tracking localizer courses and VOR radials. Remember that the CDI sensing is sharper and faster on the localizer course.
  2. Disorientation during transition to the ILS due to poor planning and reliance on one receiver instead of on all available airborne equipment. Use all the assistance available; a single receiver may fail.
  3. Disorientation on the localizer course, due to the first error noted above.
  4. Incorrect localizer interception angles. A large interception angle usually results in overshooting, and possible disorientation. When intercepting, if possible, turn to the localizer course heading immediately upon the first indication of needle movement. An ADF receiver is an excellent aid to orient you during an ILS approach if there is a locator or NDB on the inbound course.
  5. Chasing the CDI and glide path needles, especially when you have not sufficiently studied the approach before the flight.


Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: